Comments |
|
I wish you and your wife all luck for future. I know, how bad it is to have not enough money...
|
Poserkatz [ 25 Nov 2004 07:18 ]
|
|
|
Same for me Hawk, I red about your cable connection or your newsgroup and know just a little about not having enough money (I've 30 € till the end of the month ...) But your wife had luck finding a new job ! Don't worry, we'll wait for you
|
Tormie [ 25 Nov 2004 08:26 ]
|
|
|
Tormie likes a lot my virtual food ...
|
Posy [ 25 Nov 2004 08:28 ]
|
|
|
ehm... Yes...
|
Tormie [ 25 Nov 2004 08:28 ]
|
|
|
Yes, we'll wait for you Hawktoey! Take care!
|
JanReinar [ 25 Nov 2004 12:39 ]
|
|
|
I was just thinking about you yesterday. I wondered why or where you was. Glad to here things are getting back to sort of normal. I can relate to those charges. I went to DSL light. See you around.
|
tda42 [ 25 Nov 2004 13:36 ]
|
|
|
Good to see you still around
Bloody DSL costs alright! But it's worth every cent
|
Ozymandias Jones [ 25 Nov 2004 14:03 ]
|
|
|
Good to hear from you! I can relate to the moneything too. Btw what's dsl? is it cable....
|
TdaC [ 25 Nov 2004 22:12 ]
|
|
|
dsl is a kind of broadband connction, I've it and I'm online 24h a day paying 36 € per month
|
Tormie [ 25 Nov 2004 22:19 ]
|
|
|
oh ok i have broadband too, just never heard the term dsl before
|
TdaC [ 25 Nov 2004 22:33 ]
|
|
|
The dsl uses the normal phone line for broadband, it's popular and cheap to install because it doesn't need a dedicated cable, like the optical one...
|
Tormie [ 25 Nov 2004 22:39 ]
|
|
|
Thanks all!
TdaC ~ DSL use your existing phone line to connect. It's only a tad slower than a cable connection. I had cable at home and we use DSL at work. I can notice a difference as far as loading times, but it's about 30 times faster than dial-up. Plus I don't have to have two phone lines to use it. Cable is about 50 times faster than dial-up. I tried visiting on dial-up from home and it would take close to a minute for each page to load there. Here at work it's a matter of seconds for it to load.
|
Hawktoey [ 26 Nov 2004 01:01 ]
|
|
|
Money problems always lead to other problems.
I hope that things work out for you and your family.
I'm on cable here, myself. I used to have the hi-speed version.
Downloads were sometimes up to 300K per second on FTP sites.
That costed $43.00 CDN per month. Since I don't download
much, I went to the Lite version. It's $24.95 per month.
Downloads are about 14K per second. It's slow, but I don't
use the net much anymore. It's good enough for me.
I may switch to the DSL and digital TV next year.
The TV offerings are much better than cable and you can pick what you
want to see, instead of what the cable company forces you to take.
We only have one cable and one phone provider here.
Take care
|
Den Tracy [ 26 Nov 2004 19:02 ]
|
|
|
Thanks Den! We only have one cable and one phone provider here as well. And the cable doesn't provide us with an option of full or lite. You get full or nothing. I am definatley going to go with direct tv after we get our bills caught up. All the channels are digital for one, and you get 125 channels for $36 US. Cable only gives you 60 channels for same price and they are not digital. If you want digital on cable you have to rent the box for $6 a month extra each box, and then only the channels from 99 up are digital. I only hope that I can get the dish to work as our view of the south has quite a few trees. I talked to the company and they are sending a technician out to see if in fact we can even consider the dish.
|
Hawktoey [ 27 Nov 2004 01:41 ]
|
|
|