I seldom comment on 3D nudes because they all have the same Vicky character base in them.  Taking it one step further, I won't even look at a pic that has the *nudity* flag. Seen one, you've seen 'em all.
Don't anyone take it personally. I just don't find these type of images very meaningful.
   

And I suppose you just read the articles in Playboy  

Just razzing ya', Den. I do know what you mean though. It can get a but monotonus at times.

Oh, We know that you like much more those naked Mikes with a big sword Den   ... I will paint something for you    ...

This was supposed to be a question, but the question mark was missing and I never noticed it until I saw
Tormentor's comment and couldn't figure out what he was talkin' about.
I had to edit the title today.
  

I see that without the question mark, it  sounds like an observation.

Tormentor:
No thanks on the Mike pix with swords long or short...  
I won't look at those either...

Well, I am tired of the naked-vicki-just-naked-to-gain-hits type of pics

I'm a dirty old guy in a wheelchair so...............Bring them on. As far as art some nude pic are quite interesting. Thats if they are a mood or generate thought. I was going to post a mood pic but have held off cause of tastes here........don't want to offend.

Speeeeeeeeeeeeeeedy WC ever looking a beauty where he can find it

True enough Ken, but it appears to be that everyone is only interested in that type
of content.  

Those pics almost always get all the comments and far more worthy images go unnoticed.
Portraits are pretty much the same story.
Personally, what people choose to do is fine by me.

To constantly post nudes with every image posted doesn't make sense to me.
A nude once in awhile is fine, but not every post just to get views.

I just hope people don't see me as a hypocrit    many of my pics contain nudity, but I mainly try and use it to enhance the mood of the pic. A naked person seems much more vurnerable than a clothed one

I've an intelligent comment to write here, but:
- it is in italian
- it's late here and I don't want to translate it
- :PRRR!:

(tomorrow I'll wite my thought, but don't worry Den, your little secret will stay between you and me   )

I wasn't referring to your images, Ken.
They are provocative and tell the story like it is.
You don't use Vicky from what I have seen, Ken. It is Stephanie as the base character.
Correct ?
Also, your images reflect real life instances and emotions, whereas the other images done
by just about everyone else is nothing more than nude glamour posing.

WC, you can't offend me with any nudity in a pic.

(Unless it is our illustrious webmaster getting out of the bathtub facing us(part 2of the image in the gallery)....
Then I will have to run for the hills.      
(It will take awhile to find some. The nearest small mountain (really tiny) is a couple of hundred
miles away and no it ain't the Rockies)
Manitoba is pretty much flat prairie.

Well,
as far as I am concerned, still working in Poser3 and conforming clothing isn´t supported,
I only have the option to play with combinations of texturing, morphing , and parenting static props. That can be qite annoying.... so:

I like my Posette nude

Nude, clothed, it's all the same if the image says something.

Just nudity for it's own sake... why do they bother with Poser, just hire a real model. For the cost of Poser 5, V3, M3 and some of the high end character packs, clothing packs and props, you could easily afford a decent digital camera a couple of lights and the cost of a few nude models a month.

 

Ahjah... It might be time to upgrade to Poser 4.  

Think of the transparency maps  :D/

...well, your right
unfortunally. I´m permanently low on money

I know that feeling well